• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Okay so the light bulb example can be wrong. My grandpa would heat his room with a 100 watt bulb meaning both the light and the heat were useful outputs.

    • mastod0n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean isn’t this wrong? It may be near 100% but there’s never 100% conversion to a single kind of energy. For example, even if it’s just a tiny faction, magnetic field convert electrical energy to kinetic energy, no?

          • Shayeta@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I guess we could also say that eventually that heat will escape outdoors and be radiated back into space, a tiny fraction of that will end up on the sun, and be sent back again.

    • Noved@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which travels to a location, hits it and is eventually converted to heat.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Typically a heater is in a room, so any light doesn’t need to go further than the nearby walls

          • nexguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            But a heater produces heat and light. The light might turn into heat later but that’s not heat from the heater. Otherwise everything is s heater and it’s all part of the same heater… the universe.

    • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      When light is absorbed by surface, the material temperature increases and remits light at a longer wave, ussually in the IR spectrum. So its safe to say all light is heat enegry.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Setup sponsored by Cyberpunk 2077: Ultimate Edition, to have a real toasting effect.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      A completely valid pannini press, imo.

      Like this is literally the ‘modern problems require modern solutions’ meme.

      I’ve used older PC battlestations of mine as ‘bonus’ spaceheaters more than once, lol, sorta like those ‘pocket warmer’ apps for phones that would just run some absurd computation that would redline the cpu, hahah!

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have a little “tradition” of doing a playthrough of very hardware-demanding stuff in winter. Tarkov is one of my favs for this since it’s unoptimized as hell and the post soviet aesthetics really fit the season

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I may get flack for this but mine was the Cinematic Mod version of HL2.

          Not because I wanted … the terrible ‘cinematic’ music, or ludicrous XXX character model ‘upgrades’… I genuienly liked the revamped maps, greater texture detail.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I had some frozen imitation crab legs that I wanted to eat, but didn’t want to microwave proper. I put them on top of my PC’s GPU radiator and ran a stress test while watching stuff so it would thaw faster without overheating.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh.

          Sorry, I’m… actually unfamiliar with concept.

          Is that basically a sausage with a small loaf of bread baked around it?

            • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ah ok! I don’t speak Dutch, but it looks like a kind of … flakier, pastry style bread… honestly looks delicious!

              Closest thing I’ve personally had to that would probably be a piroshki/pirogi, or maybe a calzone, but those both use more… bready breads, if that makes any sense, lol.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        … Some people keep track of their power bricks and know where they’ve been.

        … Never thought ‘good cable management’ would become a hygiene/sanitation issue, but, apparently it is.

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Power-line losses before your house, so a electric heater is only 96%-85% effecient. When the heating for bird feets is accounted, it’s 100%.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    What about heat pumps they have efficiency in the range of 200-300%

    • stom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Heat pumps move heat around, whereas radiators create it.

      The “efficiency” of heatpumps relates to heat they import into a system for a given amount of power, compared to creating heat with that power. They are not generating that heat. They are moving it.

      Similarly, it’s much more energy efficient to use a wheelbarrow to collect ice and move it inside, than it is to make ice cubes in freezer.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      2 days ago

      A brushless motor only converts ~5% of its input to heat. That’s low enough that you can reasonably call it a side effect.

      Now, a computer, that’s a heater that happens to produce math as a side effect. 100% of its input ends up as heat.

      • janAkali@lemmy.4d2.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Main effect of a brushless motor is moving matter really fast, which, on a molecular level, is same as heating it.

      • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I love firing up my PC and gaming on cold winter nights. A well placed fan or two and I can spread it through my entire apartment and the heat won’t kick on all night. Ends up saving me money, my heater costs way more than my PC to run.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              By “well below” do you mean -30? Or do you mean -5? Either way, you must have much better insulation than I do, because I have multi-kilowatt heaters and even on not-so-cold days my poor PC can’t compete, no matter how hard I game.

              • lonefighter@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Like anywhere from -15 to -4 C (around 5-25 F). I also keep it around 15 C (60 F) in my apartment to keep heating costs lower so it doesn’t need to get super warm to keep my thermostat from kicking on.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It all becomes heat eventually in the end though. Sometimes it’s just a multi step complex process outside the physical bounds of the heater.

        Wait a sec, is the universe just God’s space heater?

        • potpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          In god’s universe it is winter and that’s why the earth is heating up. It says so right in Ecclesiasties. Boom, toasted climate change nerds.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, what is that motor doing? If it’s a drill, it’s spinning a drill bit and that drill bit generates a lot of friction when it tries to make a hole in something, and that friction generates heat. If it’s spinning a tire, that tire generates a lot of friction with the road.

      • Tiger_Man_@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        if you dont count powering i/o devices (other heaters) (or electromagnetic wave emmiters so heaters with extra steps)

    • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Indeed we’ve plugged in a bitcoin miner to our central heating and now heating is “free”. I’m not sure how profitable it is when you’re not using the heat though.

  • cass27@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Noise would be a small but non-zero form of heat loss that shouldn’t contribute to temperature increase

    • dz2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Noise would turn in to heat as it’s absorbed, so it’s just heat with extra steps. Same deal with lights

  • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    263
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Resistive heaters still suck though because Heat pumps give you 200-400% efficiency. So heating wise, “100%” still less than maximally efficient.

    (Not a violation of thermodynamics btw. Heat pumps use electricity to move heat energy that already exists, so the electric power in is often significantly smaller than the heat coming out of the device)

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Resistive heaters still suck though

      • Resistive heaters are much more portable and flexible. (edit: and quiet)
      • Resistive heaters are a viable backup when heat pumps fail in extremely cold weather.
      • Resistive heaters are less money upfront for if you only have to use them occasionally.

      One is not directly beneath the other. Both have their place.

      • AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fair enough, do we need to extend this heater solidarity to combustibles as well?

        I mean technically they’re infinitely electrically efficient if you don’t use electricity to start them lol

    • SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Strictly speaking that’s not efficiency, but a coefficient of performance.

      And funny enough the work energy doesn’t even have to be electricity. It’s actually mechanical energy, that is required and you could even power a heat pump with a steam or diesel engine.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, but you can use some forms of “light” to heat things

          If you want confusing specifics, light has negative absolute temperature

          • captcha@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Yeah, that is a bit confusing, i never thought about light being an example of one of those systems. Edit: looks like this applies only to laser light because light has a temperature of an emitting body, and lazing body has negative temperature

            my short interpretation would be like this

            A system with negative thermodynamic temperature is hotter than any system with a positive temperature. If a negative-temperature system and a positive-temperature system come in contact, heat will flow from the negative- to the positive-temperature system.

            This situation occurs because temperature is not really a measure of speed of particles, but rather a measure of entropy, and for ordinary objects entropy can increase infinitely, increasing temperature too. For systems with capped amount of states entropy reduces when energy is added, and that is negative thermodynamic temperature.

            So negative temperature is more energetic than positive, and because of that it heats up positive temperature object when in contact.

            Light kinda does that, but I am not sure I can come up with an explanation of how to measure its temperature and if it fits the definition

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They can drop all the way to 0 if the temperature difference is high enough. You can’t heat your house with a heat pump if it’s 0K outside.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Heat pumps generally come with an electrical resistive backup in case it’s too cold outside, so even at arbitrarily low temperatures a heat pump can only drop to 100%

          • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            At that point, the heat pump is off and you’re using a resistive heater. You can’t just glue an LED to an incandescent lightbulb and call it a 50% efficient incandescent lightbulb.

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              True. You know, the moment I left that comment, I thought that was pedantic, I shouldn’t have said it, but by that point if I had deleted it it would just sit there saying deleted forever and that would bother me even more

              • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I usually issue retractions by just putting a strikethrough on the text of the comment (using double tildes [~~] on each side).

        • ultracritical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Heat pump could heat your house if it’s near 0K “outside”. Heat pumps are how we chill to near 0K anyways. And by heat pump I mean literally a window air conditioner. Replace the freon in your typical AC with helium and get a really fancy evaporator (cold head or cold finger is the trade term) and you could probably get a 10cc vial on the end to sub 70K. With vacuum and a bigger 240V window AC unit you can get near 4K. Running multiple heat pumps in stages and with liquid nitrogen as coolant for some of them and you can condense helium and push really close to 0K.

  • antsu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not well-versed on this topic, but doesn’t the AC frequency cause alternating fields in the heating element, making it vibrate slightly? If that’s correct, then you’re losing an incredibly stupidly tiny amount of energy as sound too.

    • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      And that satisfying glow is losses as light, which will do some heating, but not as efficiently

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s a whole class of electric heater that do this intentionally. Radiant heaters are awesome for outdoor patios and other spaces like uninsulated garages where you care more about heating surfaces than the air itself.

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t know why but as much as I’ve read about radiant heaters to try understanding them your random comment I read here is what it took for things to finally click into place for me. I really love those ah ha moments. Just wanted to say thank you.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Most of the heating energy would actually be IR, which many types of window glass will be designed to reflect. It probably depends on what kind of coatings are used. Basically all car windows block IR to help keep the inside of the car cool in the sun.

          • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s a silly thing, but if it glows orange, and if any of that orange light escapes or is visible from the window, it is not 100% efficient. But this is just pedantic in reality, even cheap heaters will do a good job of converting electricity into heat.

      • bebabalula@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, if you want to go all “technically” on this, then that sound technically dissipates as heat when it is absorbed by the interior of the room.

          • Danitos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Why not? My underestanding is that 100% energy of a sound wave will ultimately be transformed to kinetic energy to particles in the room, be it a wall’s, an ear drum’s or air’s.

            • scratchee@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              As a rule of thumb that’s fine, but it’s not precisely true. There will always be a little energy going everywhere it can.

              Entropy doesn’t mean “everything turns into heat” it means everything becomes dispersed across all the possible states. Most of the possible states are possible states of heat, so that’s where most of the energy ends up, but only most. The chance that all the energy ends up as heat is similar to the chance that you turn on a heater and it heats up everything except for a small thermometer which stays mysteriously cold. Sure, most of the heat would be outside the thermometer, but you expect the thermometer to get its share of the energy. Equally you expect light and sound and gravitational potential and chemical to get their “fair share”, even if it’s a very small share.

              Edit: I guess you could say all the energy would pass through heat at some point. That’s probably true, but equally you could say all the energy ends up as light at some point, and that’s probably true too, as it wobbles between possible states randomly. More usefully can ask what ratio ends up in each form before reaching a steady state (where the amount of sound turning into heat is equal to the amount of heat turning into sound)